Disclaimer: Own Bamboo is a reader supported website. We are a member of Amazon Affiliates and this post may contain affiliate links. Meaning Own Bamboo receives a small commission from Amazon sellers if you make a purchase through our links, at no additional cost to you. For more information please visit out Affiliate Disclaimer Page.
Among the many many exhausting truths uncovered by COVID-19 is the massive disparity between the world’s wealthy and poor. As economies went into freefall, the world’s billionaires elevated their already big fortunes by 27.5%. And as many strange folks misplaced their jobs and fell into poverty, The Guardian reported “the 1% are coping” by taking personal jets to their luxurious retreats.
Such perverse affluence additional fuelled criticism of the so-called 1%, which has lengthy been the usual rhetoric of the political Left.
In 2011, Occupy Wall Road protesters referred to as out rising financial inequality by proclaiming: “We’re the 99%!”. And an Oxfam report in September final yr lamented how the richest 1% of the world’s inhabitants are accountable for greater than twice as a lot carbon air pollution because the poorest half of humanity.
However you may be stunned to seek out this 1% doesn’t simply comprise the super-rich. It might embody you, or folks you already know. And this truth has huge implications for social justice and planetary survival.
Look within the mirror
If you hear references to the 1%, you would possibly consider billionaires similar to Amazon’s Jeff Bezos or Tesla founder Elon Musk. Nonetheless, as of October final yr there have been 2,189 billionaires worldwide — a minuscule proportion of the 7.8 billion folks on Earth. So clearly, you don’t need to be a billionaire to hitch this world elite.
So how wealthy do it’s important to be? Effectively, Credit score Suisse’s World Wealth Report in October final yr confirmed a person web price of US$1 million (A$1,295,825) – mixed revenue, investments and private property — will make you among the many world’s 1% richest folks.
The newest official knowledge reveals the typical Australian family has a web price of A$1,022,200. Australia’s richest 20% of households – about two million of them – have an common web price of A$3.2 million. Even when these households comprised two income-earning adults, their web price equally divided would put many within the high 1% of worldwide wealth holders.
What does all this imply for the planet?
It’s true the per capita emissions of the super-rich are more likely to be far better than others within the high 1%. However this doesn’t negate the uncomfortable truth Australians are amongst a fraction of the worldwide inhabitants monopolising world wealth. This group causes the huge bulk of the world’s local weather harm.
A 2020 Oxfam report reveals the world’s richest 10% produce a staggering 52% of complete carbon emissions. According to this, a 2020 College of Leeds research discovered richer households world wide are inclined to spend their extra cash on energy-intensive merchandise, similar to package deal holidays and automotive gasoline. The UN’s 2020 Emission Hole Report additional confirmed this, discovering the highest 10% use round 75% of all aviation vitality and 45% of all land transport vitality.
It’s clear that wealth, and its consequent vitality privilege, is neither socially simply nor ecologically sustainable.
A possible answer
A lot consideration and headlines are dedicated to the unethical wealth of billionaires. And whereas the criticism is justified, it distracts from a broader wealth downside — together with our personal.
We must always observe right here, one can have an revenue that’s massive in comparison with the worldwide common, and nonetheless expertise important financial hardship. As an example in Australia, the housing prices of a couple of million households exceed 30% of complete revenue – the generally used benchmark for housing affordability.
Right here lies a central problem. Even when we needed to cut back our wealth, the huge price of maintaining a roof over our head prevents us from doing so. Servicing a mortgage or paying lease is one among our largest monetary obligations, and a key driver within the pursuit of wealth.
However as we’ve proven above, as private wealth grows, so too does environmental devastation. The rule even applies to the bottom paid, who’re working simply to pay the lease. The industries they depend on, similar to retail, tourism and hospitality, are themselves related to environmental harm.
Current financial and social buildings imply stepping off this wealth-creating treadmill is nearly unattainable. Nonetheless as we’ve written earlier than, folks might be liberated from their reliance on financial development when land – the very basis of our safety – will not be commodified.
For social justice and ecological survival, we should urgently experiment with new land and housing methods, to make doable a way of life of lowered wealth and consumption and elevated self-sufficiency.
This would possibly embody city commons, such because the R-City undertaking in Paris, the place a number of hundred folks co-manage land that features a small farm for collective use, a recycling plant and cooperative eco-housing.
Underneath a brand new land technique, different methods of conserving assets could possibly be deployed. One such instance, developed by Australian tutorial Ted Coach, includes reducing our earnings sharply – with paid work for less than two days in every week. For the remainder of the working week, we’d are inclined to neighborhood meals gardens, community and share many issues we at the moment eat individually.
Such a way of life may assist us re-evaluate the quantity of wealth we have to dwell properly.
The social and ecological challenges the world faces can’t be exaggerated. New considering and creativity is required. And step one on this journey is taking an sincere have a look at whether or not our personal wealth and consumption habits are contributing to the issue.
Clarification: this text has been up to date to state that, for Australia’s richest 20% of households, the typical web price of two income-earning adults would put many within the high 1% of worldwide wealth holders.
This text is republished from The Dialog below a Artistic Commons license. Writer: Alex Baumann, Informal Tutorial, Faculty of Social Sciences & Psychology, Western Sydney College and Samuel Alexander, Analysis fellow, Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The College of Melbourne.
Cowl picture by Inga Seliverstova.